Legal Opinion

Miller v. Marriner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Tbe fifth issue submitted to tbe jury was as follows: “Did L. C. Marriner cause or procure said sale to be made?” -To this issue tbe jury answered “N'o.” Upon this issue tbe plaintiffs in apt time requested tbe court to charge tbe jury as follows: “If you believe tbe evidence and find tbe facts to be as testified, you will answer tbe fifth issue ‘Yes.’ ” And in tbe event tbe court refused to give this instruction, tbe plaintiffs requested tbe court to charge further upon this issue as follows: “Tbe court charges you that, if you find by tbe greater weight of evidence that said mortgage sale…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gore v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Jones v. SherrardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
  3. Freeland v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Thompson v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Worley v. . WorleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Taylor v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Yates v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. (In re Yates)District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API