Miller v. Marriner
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
Tbe fifth issue submitted to tbe jury was as follows: “Did L. C. Marriner cause or procure said sale to be made?” -To this issue tbe jury answered “N'o.” Upon this issue tbe plaintiffs in apt time requested tbe court to charge tbe jury as follows: “If you believe tbe evidence and find tbe facts to be as testified, you will answer tbe fifth issue ‘Yes.’ ” And in tbe event tbe court refused to give this instruction, tbe plaintiffs requested tbe court to charge further upon this issue as follows: “Tbe court charges you that, if you find by tbe greater weight of evidence that said mortgage sale…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gore v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Jones v. SherrardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
- Freeland v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Thompson v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Worley v. . WorleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Taylor v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Yates v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. (In re Yates)District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.