Legal Opinion

Denoia v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 12, 2003No. 3D02-1099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.

John Denoia appeals an adverse summary judgment in his suit seeking uninsured motorist benefits. On the facts present here, we conclude that defendant-appellee Hartford Fire Insurance Company was not entitled to summary judgment.

*286Plaintiff Denoia’s automobile is insured by defendant Hartford. While driving westbound on the multi-lane Gratigny Parkway, the plaintiff was involved in an accident.

As we interpret the plaintiffs deposition, the car in front of the plaintiff ran over a steel beam which was lying in the roadway. This propelled the beam up into the air, and it struck the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Amarnick v. AUTO. INS. OF HARTFORD, CONN.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Allstate Ins. Co. v. BandieraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile etc. v. Denise Lorraine HananiaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API