Sandifur v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Mark L. Sandifur appeals his conviction for Dealing in a Schedule II Controlled Substance, as a Class B Felony, following a jury trial, and presents the following issues for our review:
1. Whether the trial court committed fundamental error when it admitted into evidence Sandifur's audiotaped statement to police, which contained references to a proposed polygraph examination.._ 2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion under Indiana Evidence Rule 403 when it allowed evidence that the, person to whom he had given drugs had died from a drug…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Malinski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Goolsby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Dunlap v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Willingham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Summer Snow v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- Clary v. Lite MacHines Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Rowe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Southern v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Romero Leslie v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.