Legal Opinion

Sandifur v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 2004No. 79A04-0403-CR-169PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Mark L. Sandifur appeals his conviction for Dealing in a Schedule II Controlled Substance, as a Class B Felony, following a jury trial, and presents the following issues for our review:

1. Whether the trial court committed fundamental error when it admitted into evidence Sandifur's audiotaped statement to police, which contained references to a proposed polygraph examination.._ 2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion under Indiana Evidence Rule 403 when it allowed evidence that the, person to whom he had given drugs had died from a drug…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Malinski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Goolsby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Dunlap v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Willingham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Summer Snow v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Clary v. Lite MacHines Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Rowe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Southern v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Romero Leslie v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API