Legal Opinion

Boeing Co. v. March

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 9, 2009No. 06 CV 4997 (lead), 07 CV 3555 (closed member)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DAVID H. COAR, District Judge.

These two cases, which involve claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Labor-Management Relations Act, were consolidated for all purposes. In both matters, the Boeing Company seeks a declaration that a series of collective bargaining agreements negotiated by Boeing with the UAW and Local 1069 (collectively, “the Union”) did not vest lifetime health benefits for the following class:

All former employees of Boeing who retired from Boeing Rotorcraft before March 18, 2006; who, as employees, were represented…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
  2. CENTRAL MIDWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS v. DOREL JUVENILE GROUP, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API