Legal Opinion

Loesch v. Vassiliades

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 16, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

17 N.J. Super. 306 (1952)

86 A.2d 14

JACOB LOESCH, TO THE USE OF HARLEYSVILLE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

COSTAS VASSILIADES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 10, 1951.

Decided January 16, 1952.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

Mr. Huyler E. Romond argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Toolan, Haney & Romond, attorneys).

Mr. Charles P. Berman argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Albert M. Neiss, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by McGEEHAN, S.J.A.D.

The question is whether…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  2. Rubin v. L. H. Trowbridge Sign Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. MallisonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Fitzgerald v. Newark Morning Ledger Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. Cumberland Cty. Welfare Bd. v. RodriquezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Diversified Utilities Sales, Inc. v. Monte Fusco Excavating Contracting Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. GOULD v. THE GUIDA-SEIBERT DAIRY COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API