United States v. Midland Asphalt Corporation and Albert C. Litteer
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Circuit Judge:
In December, 1987, respondents Midland Asphalt Corporation (“Midland”) and Albert C. Litteer, the defendants in an ongoing criminal antitrust prosecution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, filed a notice of appeal from two orders of the district court, John T. Curtin, Ch. J., denying their motions to dismiss the indictment for alleged abuses of the grand jury process. In response, the United States filed a motion in this court to dismiss the appeal, or, in the alternative, for summary affirmance. Following oral argument, we entered…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Stanley Friedman, Michael Lazar, Lester Shafran, and Marvin Kaplan, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Eugene Lopez v. Dean R. Riley, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. MagassoubaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Harry B. Helmsley, Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Harry B. Helmsley and Leona M. HelmsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.