Legal Opinion

Hahn v. Satullo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 2004No. 03AP-259PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petree, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants (“plaintiffs”), Michael and Marie Hahn, pro se litigants, appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas that granted summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Nicholas Satullo and Reminger & Reminger Co., L.P.A. (“Reminger & Reminger”). Defendants Satullo and Reminger & Reminger cross-appeal. Because we find no reversible error, we affirm.

{¶ 2} According to plaintiffs, attorney Tobias Elsass initially represented plaintiffs in a suit against Star Bank in federal district court, wherein plaintiffs’ bank credit file was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Turner v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Dupler v. Mansfield Journal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Siegel v. Univ. of Cincinnati College of MedicineOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Young v. Univ. of Akron, 06ap-1022 (9-11-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Cook v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. In Re Blue Flame Energy Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Walker v. Firelands Community HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API