Legal Opinion
Carmack v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 20, 1975No. 47456PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice.
The question presented by this appeal is whether an Oklahoma court may acquire jurisdiction over a New York based corporation who acted as trustee for a savings plan offered by Sinclair Oil Company as part of its contracts of employment. This involves the validity of the service of summons under our long-arm statutes.
Plaintiff instituted this action in the District Court of Tulsa County against Atlantic Richfield (Arco), Sinclair Oil Company, now merged into Arco (Sinclair), and Chemical Bank New York Trust Company (Chemical) to recover damages for losses sustained because of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Buckeye Boiler Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Crescent Corporation v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Andrea Peckham v. Gem State Mutual Of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. v. M & L InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
- Wright v. KeiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.