Legal Opinion

Walters v. Inexco Oil Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1983No. 53841PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. Introduction

At the heart of this case is the question whether our statute1 requiring assessment of a penalty against an unsuccessful appellant in this Court should be enforced in the federal courts under the Erie2 doctrine.

In the case at bar, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi held that the penalty statute did not apply, even though the sole basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction was diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. That ruling has been appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit which, invoking the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. CrenshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. CrenshawMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Boardman v. United Services Auto. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Kincaid v. MangumWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Elk Horn Coal Corp. v. Cheyenne Resources, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API