Legal Opinion
Hastings v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 3, 1939No. 1204PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIELDS, District Judge.
Motions by defendants challenging the jurisdiction of the court.
In the bill of complaint plaintiff alleges 19 causes of action against 56 defendants. Defendants H. M. Byllesby and Company, Byllesby Corporation and Standard Power and Light Corporation are Delaware corporations. They will be dealt with separately. The remaining defendants reside outside the district of Delaware.
November 26, 1937 plaintiff was appointed by this court Special Trustee of certain property of Standard Gas and Electric Compány, debtor in reorganization, hereinafter called “Standard”. This…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Harrison v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Robertson v. Railroad Labor BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Schumacher v. BeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Standard Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Shverha v. Maryland Cas. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953