Legal Opinion

State v. Blue

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 5, 1975No. 20028PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice:

The defendant Daniel Blue has appealed from his conviction and sentence for safecracking (Section 16-337, 1962 Code of Laws). We grant a new trial because of error in the refusal of the trial judge to permit counsel for the de*471fendant to use, for the purpose of impeachment, a transcript of the preliminary hearing testimony in the cross-examination of a witness for the State.

A preliminary hearing was requested and granted. At this hearing, counsel for defendant requested that the testimony be taken in writing, whereupon, according to the agreed Statement, counsel was instructed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. FunderburkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  2. City of Anderson v. SeligmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. State v. HicksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. Keels v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. LathamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API