State v. Latham
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
Appellant James Robert Latham was found guilty of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, and possession of qua-aludes. We reverse.
Appellant first asserts the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the affidavit attached to the search warrant. We agree.
In State v. Smith, 230 S. C. 164, 94 S. E. (2d) 886 (1956), we held affidavits are inadmissible in a criminal case.
The trial court erred in admitting the search warrant and accompanying affidavit into evidence as the allegations contained in the affidavit were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- State v. GilbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. ArtherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- State v. ArtherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986