Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 2008No. A07-1502PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

On appeal from his convictions of ineligible person in possession of a firearm and first-degree assault, appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion by ruling that the state could impeach him with prior felony convictions if he testified and by using the Hernandez method to calculate his criminal-history score. He also raises several supplemental pro se challenges. We affirm.

FACTS

At approximately 2:00 p.m. on September 14, 2006, B.H. was returning home from a job interview. As he drove home, B.H. passed a nearby park where he greeted some friends and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. GasslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RodriguezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State of Minnesota v. Jesse Keith FultzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. State of Minnesota v. Nathan Charles Robert SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API