Legal Opinion
Blood v. Colby
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 10, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Upon plaintiffs’ motions for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, the Special Term denied them as to one defendant, and granted them as to the other. Here we have cross-appeals from both of these determinations. The defendant as to whom the motion was denied is the owner of the car involved in the accident in which the infant plaintiff was injured, and upon which the action is based. She was not in the car or present at the time or place of the accident, but she is liable by statute. (Vehicle & Traffic Law, § 59; Psota v. Long Island R. R. Co., 246 N. Y. 388; Gochee v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barrett v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Frohlich v. ZeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Bloch v. SzczukowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Shanahan v. FeltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCarthy v. Port of New York AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Hyman v. DworskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Valencia v. Markham Co-Operative Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Brown v. New York City Transit AuthorityCity of New York Municipal Court · 1960
- Kallins v. KassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966