Legal Opinion

Womack v. Consolidated Timber Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 1, 1941No. 522PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.

This action was filed by plaintiff on his own behalf and as assignee of the claims of other employees of defendant in cookhouses operated by defendant near its logging camps, based upon the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C, A. § 201 et seq. Pre-trial conferences were held and a pre-trial order was signed by the court. Subsequently, the cause was tried by the court without a jury.

The pre-trial order was drafted jointly by the attorneys for the respective parties and is here set out in full as an excellent example of such an order.1…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Consolidated Timber Co. v. WomackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  2. Morgan v. Social Security BoardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Southern Package Corp. v. WaltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API