Legal Opinion
Worth Corp. v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 17, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
The plaintiff, the owner of a department store, entered into a . contract with the Richmond Boro Distributors, Inc., by which that corporation agreed to deliver packages for the plaintiff, to collect any charges due thereon and to pay them to the plaintiff. By that contract it was also required that the Richmond Boro Distributors, Inc., furnish a surety bond indemnifying the plaintiff against loss resulting from the failure of the Richmond Boro Distributors, Inc., to account to the plaintiff for the funds so collected. The complaint alleges that the bond, dated July 6, 1929, required by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Proving the Will of BergdorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- New York Bank Note Co. v. Hamilton Bank Note Engraving & Printing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. New York & Queens County Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Irvine v. . New York Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- W. H. McElwain Co. v. PrimaveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fehr Bros. v. ScheinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- International Paper Co. v. GrossmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Loving & Associates, Inc. v. CarothersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Coken Co., Inc. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- United States Shoe Corp. v. HackettDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.