State v. Rankin

DANA, Justice.

William Rankin appeals from judgments entered in the Superior Court (Knox County, Marsano, J.) following jury verdicts finding him guilty of robbery, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 651 (1983), aggravated assault, id. § 208 (1983), and assault, id. § 207 (1983 & Supp.1994). Rankin contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of robbery, and that the court erred in its response to an alleged discovery violation and in denying his motion for a new trial with respect to the robbery count. We vacate the judgment entered on the robbery conviction.

The evidence at the trial may be…