Legal Opinion

Succession of Morgan

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 2, 1909No. 17,727PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Fred D. King, Judge. The administrator of the succession of Marie Louise Morgan, widow oi the late Charles A. Whitney, filed an account, in which he allowed and proposed to pay W. Morgan Gurley, a notary public, a certain fee for taking an inventory. Guriey opposed the account on the ground that the allowance was inadequate, and, his opposition having been dismissed, he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

On Opposition of W. M. Gurley to Account of Administrator.

LAND, J.

The administrator of the succession of Mrs. Whitney filed an account, in which he allowed and proposed to pay “W. Morgan Gurley, notary public, for inventory, $500.”

Mr. Gurley opposed the account on the ground that the allowance of $500 was wholly inadequate for the services rendered by him as notary in a succession involving approximately $1,500,000, and averred that a fair, reasonable, and just compensation for the services rendered was $2,250, and prayed that the account be amended by placing him thereon as a privileged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robouam's Heirs v. Robouam'sSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1838
  2. City Item Co-operative Printing Co. v. Phoenix Furniture Concern, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  3. Succession of HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  4. Hawford v. AdlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
  5. State ex rel. Barrow v. OgdenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. Boagni v. Police Jury of Parish of St. LandryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Succession of AlexanderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API