Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Frew v. Scoular

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1917No. 18734Published

Appeal from the district court' for Nuckolls county: Leslie G. Hurd, Judge.

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hamer, J.,

concurring in part, and dissenting as to that part of the majority opinion which refuses to dismiss the case.

I concur in so much of the opinion as holds that the judgment of the district court shall not stand and reverses the same. But I would go further and dismiss the case. To the mind of the writer the majority opinion would import the Scotch statute of limitations into Nebraska and determine the liability of the defendant by that statute, and without consulting our own statute of limitations. ■ It denies to the resident in Nebraska the protection which the Nebraska statute of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Harper v. . FairleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Waughop v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Kallenbach v. DickinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Van Keuren v. . ParmeleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  5. Littlefield v. . LittlefieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API