Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fillippini

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 14, 1973PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

The defendants were separately indicted for armed robbery while masked and for assault with intent to murder, tried under the provisions of G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G, and convicted by a jury on each indictment. They have assigned the following as error: by Fillippini, the denial of his motion for a psychiatric examination of a prosecution witness; by both defendants, the admission of testimony concerning footprints found in the vicinity of the robber’s escape vehicle and near Fillippini’s home; by Andrews, the denial of a motion to strike the footprint testimony and the trial judge’s refusal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RichardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. WelcomeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. Commonwealth v. BernierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. RichmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BookerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. BeausoleilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. MangulaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. EdgerlyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. CoteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API