Legal Opinion

In re Lashawnda G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, respondent father appeals from an order that, inter alia, terminated his parental rights with respect to the subject child. Contrary to the father’s contention, Family Court did not err in denying his request for post-termination visitation. It is well settled that a parent seeking post-termination visitation must “establish that such contact would be in the best interests of the child[ ]” (Matter of Andrea E. [Valerie E.], 72 AD3d 1617, 1618 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 703 [2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Cuomo v. Long Island Lighting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. In re Andrea E. Steuben County Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. In re Sean H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. In re Malashia B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Hailey ZZ.New York Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API