Legal Opinion
Wild Watershed v. Hurlocker
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 12, 2020No. 19-2106PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH June 12, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT WILD WATERSHED; MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITIES TASK FORCE; DR. ANN MCCAMPBELL, M.D.; JAN BOYER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. No. 19-2106 SANFORD HURLOCKER, District Ranger, Santa Fe National Forest; JAMES MELONAS, Supervisor, Santa Fe National Forest; CAL JOYNER, Southwest Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service; and VICTORIA CHRISTIANSEN, Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, an agency of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Defendants-Appellees.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Carl PetrickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Devon Energy Production Company LP v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024
- McLean v. United States Customs and Border ProtectionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- Melinda Lucero v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Mitchell International, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2026