Legal Opinion

Elenberg v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

While the evidence disclosed that the plaintiff, a real estate operator, was suffering from a disease of the heart which limited his activities to some extent, he failed to establish by a fair preponderance of evidence that such disease totally disabled him within the definition contained in either policy.

The judgments should be reversed, with costs, and the complaints dismissed, with costs.

Present •— Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Judgments unanimously reversed, with costs, and complaints dismissed, with costs.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shabotzky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Schwenk v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Schwenk v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939