Legal Opinion
E.H. v. Tirozzi
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 16, 1990No. H-88-431 (AHN)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVAS, District Judge.
K. is a thirteen year old Downs Syndrome child receiving special education in the public schools of Groton, Connecticut. K.’s parents, E.H. and H.H., have brought this action pursuant to, inter alia, the Education of the Handicapped Act (“EHA”), 20 U.S.C. Sections 1400 et seq., 1 to reverse the decision of a state hearing officer and to grant them permission to tape record Planning and Placement Team (“PPT”) meetings. The case is now before this court on cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- V.W. v. FavoliseDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
- Horen v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF TOLEDODistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009