Legal Opinion

Steimer v. Steimer

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion upon an order to show cause, why the judgment herein, entered September 10, 1901, annulling a marriage, should not be vacated and set aside as being fraudulent, collusive, in violation of the statute and contrary to law.

1Opinion of the CourtClabke, J.

This is a motion upon an order to show cause, returnable in Special Term, Part III, and referred by the justice then presiding to me for determination why the judgment herein, entered on the 10th of September, 1901, annulling a marriage, should not be vacated and set aside as being fraudulent, collusive, in violation of the statute and contrary to law. The affidavit upon which the order to show cause was granted was made by the mother of the defendant, a girl of nineteen, and while the affiant has no other standing in court than any other stranger to the action, yet the court in such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. MontgomeryNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
  2. Lyon v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  3. E. B. v. E. C. B.New York Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Fowler v. FowlerNew York Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Feig v. FeigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. California-Western States Life Insurance v. SanfordDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1981
  3. Rubman v. RubmanNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Labbate v. LabbateNew York Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API