Legal Opinion

State v. Wargo

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 4, 1985No. 2 CA-CR 3691-3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Judge.

Defendant stands convicted of aggravated assault on evidence showing that he shot the victim. His defense was self-defense. His appeal raises a single question, whether the trial court constitutionally erred in precluding, as a sanction for violation of discovery rules, the presentation of two defense witnesses. We have jurisdiction under A.R.S. § 13-4033 and affirm.

The day before trial, defense counsel notified the prosecutor that he had discovered two new witnesses who would testify to what he termed “collateral impeachment,” that the wife of the victim was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. OrantezArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. State v. ArmendarisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API