Legal Opinion

Lipsitz v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2019No. 72057PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, HARDESTY, J.:

Appellant Ryan Matthew Lipsitz was convicted of seven sexually related counts, including sexual assault and attempted sexual assault. He argues that the district court erred when it allowed the victim to testify by two-way audiovisual transmission, which violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. We take this opportunity to adopt the test set forth in Maryland v. Craig , 497 U.S. 836, 850, 110 S.Ct. 3157, 3166, 111 L.Ed.2d 666 (1990), to determine whether a witness's testimony at trial via two-way audiovisual transmission violates a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Maresca v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. El Pueblo v. Cruz RosarioSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2020
  2. Goad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2021
  3. PRICE (ANTHONY) v. DIST. CT. (STATE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2025
  4. BROWN (LARRY) v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Bean (Jerimiah) Vs. State (Death Penalty-Direct)Nevada Supreme Court · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API