Legal Opinion

Fowler-Curtis Co. v. Dean

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

H. T. Kellogg, Acting P. J.:

The complaint alleges that prior to September, 1919, the plaintiff manufactured shirts for Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc.; that in all matters relating to such manufacture the defendant acted as the agent of Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc.; that the defendant was at all times a director of that company; that prior to September, 1919, the plaintiff notified Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc., that it would discontinue to manufacture shirts for it; that the plaintiff had at this time an opportunity to manufacture shirts for another corporation on better terms; that on September…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Gramercy Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  2. Richman v. Brookhaven Servicing Corp.Suffolk County District Court · 1975
  3. Hull v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Mishkin v. Ensminger (In Re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. Rost v. KesslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API