Legal Opinion
Munch v. City of Mott
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1981No. Civ. 9929PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
Two basic questions presented in this case are:(1) Is a city ordinance which confers enforcement standing upon any “affected citizen or property owner” valid?(2) What is the role of the judiciary in reviewing legislative, executive or administrative decisions of the governing body of a municipal corporation?
In addition, we are asked to decide (a) whether or not evidence was improperly admitted, (b) whether or not the district court abused its discretion in allowing expert witness fees under the circumstances of this case, and (c) whether or not the issue of damages was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shaw v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Geo. E. Haggart, Inc. v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- City of Fargo, Cass Cty. v. Harwood TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Schuh v. Allery Ex Rel. AlleryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Soo Line Railroad Company v. City of WiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ebach v. RalstonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Fargo v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Pulkrabek v. Morton CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Barnes County v. Garrison Diversion Conservancy DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Mini Mart, Inc. v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.