Legal Opinion

Preston v. Porter Fertilizer Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1929No. 7155PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

1. If in a claim case the plaintiff in 6. fa. fails to make out a prima facie case, the remedy of the claiman i is a motion to dismiss the levy, and not a motion to direct a verdict in his favor. Barnes v. Carter, 120 Ga. 895 (48 S. E. 387); Zipperei v. Savannah, 128 Ga. 135 (57 S. E. 311) ; Equitable Mfg. Co. v. Davis, 130 Ga. 67 (60 S. E. 262); Stewart v. Mundy, 131 Ga. 586 (4) (62 S. E. 986); Decatur County Bank v. Thomason, 31 Ga. App. 299 (120 S. E. 642). It follows that if a plaintiff in ñ. fa. failed to make out a prima facie ease, the court did not err in refusing to direct a verdict…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barnes v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Beall v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  3. Harris v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Gordon v. SpellmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  5. Zipperer v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bulloch v. HutchesonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API