Legal Opinion

Sierra Club v. United States Forest Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 20, 1996No. Nos. 95-35892, 95-36033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

This consolidated appeal requires us to determine when “preparation” of a salvage timber sale ends for purposes of the Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Assistance and Rescissions Act (the Act), Pub.L. No. 104r-19,109 Stat. 194 (1995).

This action is a National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et. seq., challenge to proposed salvage timber sales in the Warner Creek area of Oregon. After Plaintiffs filed their complaint, Congress passed the Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Assistance and Rescissions Act, eliminating the need to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. Alvarez-SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Northwest Forest Resource Council v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re James E. Mitchell and Diane C. Mitchell, Debtors. James E. Mitchell Diane C. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Associated Contract Loggers, Inc. v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  2. Sierra Club, a California Nonprofit Corporation Oregon Natural Resources Council, an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation Charlie Ogle v. United States Forest Service, Sierra Club, a California Nonprofit Corporation Oregon Natural Resources Council, an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation, and Charlie Ogle v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API