Associated Contract Loggers, Inc. v. United States Forest Service
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss this case, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”). Oral argument was heard on January 14, 2000. 1 The defendants’ motions are granted, and the cause is dismissed with prejudice. Further, because this Court is concerned as to plaintiffs’ and their counsel’s bona fides in initiating and prosecuting this lawsuit, the Court issues an Order to Show Cause why sanctions ought not be imposed.
I.Background
Plaintiffs are Associated Contract Loggers, Inc., and Olson Logging, Inc. Each claims to be…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Douglas v. New York State Adirondack Park AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- Kedrowski v. RichardsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020