Legal Opinion
Allen v. Egan
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 14, 2005No. 3:02CV2251(DJS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
SQUATRITO, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Paul Allen, brings this action against Gerard Egan, Eileen Meehan, and the New London County Sheriffs Department, whose responsibilities have been transferred to the Judicial Branch of the State of Connecticut. Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment (dkt.# 36) on the remaining counts in the Amended Complaint. For the reasons set forth herein, defendants’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. FACTS
In an earlier proceeding, the Court partially granted…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roberts v. The SAGE CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021