Legal Opinion
United States v. Calzada-Maravillas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 17, 2006No. 05-5029PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Armando Calzada-Maravillas pled guilty to reentry of a deported alien after former conviction of an aggravated felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1) and (2). At sentencing, the district court sua sponte departed upward, and sentenced Calzada-Maravillas to 58 months’ imprisonment. Calzada-Maravil-las appeals his sentence, claiming that the district court erred in departing upward without providing notice to him in violation of Rule 32(h) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Burns v. United States, 501 U.S. 129, 111 S.Ct. 2182, 115…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Darrin Todd HaackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. KristlCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Alapizco-ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. AtencioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. A.B.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Richard IrizzaryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.