White v. Elgin Creamery Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Union District Gourt. — IíoN. W. Ii. Tedeoed, Judge. Action fo-r the balance due ou a contract to pay Elgin prices for butter made from milk furnished by the plaintiff and one hundred and fifty-one others (who have assigned their claims to him), less four cents per pound for making and marketing. The defense was a general denial. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
1 — The patrons of the creamery were paid at the rate of eight cents per pound for eighteen thousand one hundred and sixty-five pounds of butter fat, out of which were produced twenty-one thousand six hundred and fifty pounds of butter, for which they claim Mark Sands, as agent of the Elgin Creamery Company, agreed to pay Elgin prices, less four cents a pound for making and marketing. If correct, they were entitled to ten and a half cents per pound for their butter, instead of eight cents per pound for butter fat. That Mark Sands made such a proposition to some forty of the patrons was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Patterson v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Smith v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Ceeder v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Eureka Iron & Steel Works v. BresnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Soults Farms, Inc. v. Charles J. Schafer v. Soults Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Lewis v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Ney v. Eastern Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Cotton States Belting & Supply Co. v. Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1915
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.