Legal Opinion

Foster v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1937No. 26099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

In this case a wife mortgaged her separate property to a bank to secure the debt of her husband. Subsequently the bank on several successive occasions granted to the husband extensions of time in which to pay the debt. These extension agreements were accomplished by the execution of renewal notes which differed somewhat in form from the original notes by which the loan was evidenced. All of the notes were signed by the husband alone.

The bank then instituted this action in the district court of Tulsa county against the husband and wife seeking to obtain a personal judgment against the husband…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moody v. StubbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Farmers State Bank v. FausettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Musser v. McCornick & Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API