Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Goodman

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 2007No. S-11497, S-12257PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Lisa Goodman sued Jin Hee Lee Dickerson. Dickerson answered but did not file a counterclaim. Dickerson’s motion for summary judgment was granted and the case was dismissed with prejudice. Dickerson then moved to vacate the judgment so that she could file a counterclaim. This motion was denied. Next, Dickerson asserted the same claim in a new suit. This ease was dismissed on the ground that the claim should have been asserted as a compulsory counterclaim in the first suit. Dickerson appeals the denial of her motion to vacate the judgment in the first suit and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wettanen v. CowperAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. AnthonyAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Parks v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. City & Borough of Juneau v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rollins v. State, Department of Revenue, Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cook v. CookAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Worland v. WorlandAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Sandberg v. SandbergAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Szabo v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. David Griffith v. Roger Hemphill, Donald Davis, and JDO Law, PCAlaska Supreme Court · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API