Legal Opinion

Diemer v. Eric F. Anderson, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1966No. Civ. 22658PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.

Plaintiff, Earl Diemer, appeals from a judgment in his favor in amount one dollar, on the ground of inadequacy of damages. He was injured in a fall while he was working for Harold A. Price & Company, Inc., who was a subcontractor for waterproofing a building which was being constructed by respondent, Erie F. Anderson, Inc., the general contractor. Following the judgment rendered on the jury’s verdict for one dollar damages, appellant moved for a new trial. The judge, in denying the motion, said that “from a thorough review, study and consideration of all of the evidence, the Court concludes…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  4. Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Clifford v. RuoccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clemens v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Mendoyoma, Inc. v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Bostard v. BostardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API