Legal Opinion

People v. Tarantino

California Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1955No. Crim. 5705PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.-

— Defendants Tarantino and Eichenbaum were indicted on one count of conspiracy to commit extortion (Pen. Code, § 182) and three counts of extortion (Pen. Code, § 518). Defendant Tarantino alone appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict of guilty on all four counts and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

*593Tarantino (herein sometimes called defendant) published a weekly magazine and made weekly radio broadcasts. Nine witnesses testified that they had been “blasted” or threatened with “blasting” by defendant, but that he stopped his attacks and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. HavenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. BoylesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API