Legal Opinion

Engelbert v. Warshefski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to annul the determination of respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Rome (ZBA) granting the application of respondent Adirondack Stone Products, Ltd. (Adirondack) for a special exception permit to conduct mining operations on property owned by respondents John J. Corr and Lawrence T. Corr. Supreme Court granted the petition to the extent of remitting the matter to the ZBA for the limited purpose of determining whether, in light of the mining permit issued to Adirondack by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Citizens Accord, Inc. v. Town Board of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Dukuly v. AponteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Driscoll v. Department of FireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Custom Topsoil, Inc. v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Ball v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Laidlaw Energy & Environmental Inc. v. Town of EllicottvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API