Legal Opinion
Sonobond Corporation v. Uthe Technology, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 9, 1970No. Civ. 46772PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS OF PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION OF DEFENDANT FOR A SEPARATE TRIAL
GERALD S. LEVIN, District Judge.
Preliminary Statement
Sonobond Corporation (hereinafter known as “Sonobond”) has brought suit against Uthe Technology, Inc. (hereinafter known as “Uthe”) contending that Uthe has infringed and continues to infringe Sonobond’s Patent No. 2,949,119, “Method and Apparatus Employing Vibratory Energy for Bonding Metals.” In its answer and counterclaim Uthe alleges the patent is invalid and unenforceable because it should not have been issued and because…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- John K. Rains v. Cascade Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Switzerland Cheese Assn., Inc. v. E. Horne's Market, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sokaogon Chippewa Community v. Exxon Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992
- Alarm Device Manufacturing Co. v. Alarm Products International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1973
- Electronic Assistance Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- International Olympic Committee v. San Francisco Arts & AthleticsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- International Olympic Committee v. San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986