Stiens v. Fire and Police Pension Ass'n
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
*181LOHR, Justice.
The plaintiffs, Colorado fire fighters and police officers first hired between April 8, 1978, and July 1, 1981, sought a declaratory judgment to establish that the Policemen’s and Firemen’s Pension Reform Law, as embodied in three acts,1 was retroactive legislation as applied to them, and therefore unconstitutional. The defendants are various public bodies associated with the administration of public employees’ pensions. Certain of the defendants filed motions to dismiss, and a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The trial court granted these motions, and directed entry of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- People v. VinnolaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- City & County of Denver v. LynchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- City of Lakewood v. Colfax Unlimited Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Lassner v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stilp v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Louk v. CormierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
- Urbish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Louk v. CormierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.