Stackhouse v. Barnhart
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERTSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Murleana Stackhouse seeks judicial review and reversal of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying her Supplemental Security Income disability benefits. Before the court are plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [7], and defendant’s motion for a judgment of af-firmance [10]. For the reasons discussed below, the defendant’s motion will be denied; the plaintiffs motion will be granted.
1. Background
A. Fibromyalgia
According to the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases at the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Halray Harman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- William MORALES, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Nina Green-Younger v. Joanne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Nancy KELLEY, Appellant, v. John J. CALLAHAN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morgan v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSU. CO. OF AMERICADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Sloan v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Green v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024