Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Raynard Cummings v. Michael Martel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2015No. 11-99011Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThomas, Chief Judge

I agree with the majority that Raynard Cummings’s equal protection and ineffective assistance of counsel claims should be denied. I respectfully dissent, however, from the conclusion that Cummings’s due process claim must also be denied. The Supreme Court made clear in Turner v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 466, 85 S.Ct. 546, 13 L.Ed.2d 424 (1965), and Gonzales v. Beto, 405 U.S. 1052, 92 S.Ct. 1503, 31 L.Ed.2d 787 (1972) (per curiam), that a criminal defendant’s right to a fair trial is infringed when the government solicits key testimony from a bailiff who associated closely with the jury during the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Price, Warden v. VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Michael Cooperwood,petitioner-Appellant v. Steven Cambra, Jr., Warden,respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Slovik v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Frantz v. HazeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API