Legal Opinion

Stender v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1935No. 10011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether, at the time the appellant brought this action to recover on his war risk policy, such action was barred by section 19 of the World War Veterans’ Act 1924, as amended by Act July 3, 1930, § 4 (38 U. S. C. § 445, 38 USCA § 445), which provides that, “No suit on yearly renewable term insurance shall be allowed under this section unless the same shall have been brought within six years after the right accrued for which the claim is made or within one year after July 3, 1930, whichever is the later date”; and “that this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eggen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Falbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  3. United States v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  5. United States v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kemp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
  2. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  3. Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API