Legal Opinion

Total Administrative Services Corp. v. Pipe Fitters Union Local No. 120 Insurance Fund

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 17, 2015No. 15-cv-364-jdpPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge.

This case arises out of an agreement that defendant and third-party plaintiff Pipe Fitters Union Local No. 120 Insurance Fund (the Fund) entered into with third-party defendants Vantage Financial Group, Inc. and Vantage Financial Group Plan Services, Inc. (collectively, Vantage). Vantage and the Fund are Ohio companies, and they signed their agreement in Ohio. Vantage later sold all of its assets— including the agreement — to plaintiff Total Administrative Services Corporation (TASC), a Wisconsin company.

After the sale, TASC began performing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Purdue Research Foundation v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A., Sanofi-Synthelabo, Incorporated, and Stwb, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Tamburo v. DworkinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CampbellDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020
  2. Clark v. McDonald's CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
  3. Hribar Transport LLC v. SlegersDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
  4. Jerome R Kerkman SC v. D'AmicoDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API