Legal Opinion

Consolidated Underwriters v. Ruff

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 9, 1942No. 4034PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This is a compensation case with appel-lee, Jake Ruff,- the employee, appellant, Consolidated Underwriters, the compensation insurance carrier, and Texas Creosoting Company the employer. On the verdict of the jury, answering special issues, judgment was for appellee against appellant for compensation for total disability for 156 weeks at $10.80 per week, beginning on the 10th day of August, 1941, from which appellant has regularly prosecuted its appeal.

Appellee’s employer was engaged in the business of curing and preserving timber, in part, by use of penta-chlorphenol.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas Midland R.R. Co. v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Parker v. BaileyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Reed v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Denbow v. Standard Accident InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. DenbowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Denbow v. Standard Accident InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API