Legal Opinion

Melvin v. Melvin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 1990No. 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order refusing to issue a rule to show cause why an order awarding protection from abuse should not be vacated, and a new trial on the petition be granted, when the protection order was granted following proceedings under Pa.R.C.P. 218 in absence of the defendant appellant, who alleged in the petition for the rule that he had arrived only three minutes late, but that the proceedings had already ended, and the trial court refused to reopen the matter in order for him to present his defense. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

John and Eileen Melvin were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schultz v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Mazi v. McANLISSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Seay v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Zellman v. FickenscherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First Union Mortgage Corp. v. FrempongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Telepo v. Palmer TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Cronin v. West Whiteland TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Blair-Arch v. ArchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Allied Building Products Corp. v. Delco Roofing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API