Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heflin v. Merrill

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided October 15, 2013No. 2012-CA-00663-COAPublished

1DissentGriffis, P.J.

¶ 23. I find reversible error. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

I. Whether the circuit court erred in granting Nationwide’s motion in *898limine, preventing the disclosure to the jury of Nationwide’s name and the existence of Heflin’s uninsured motorist policy through Nationwide, but permitting counsel for Nationwide to participate at trial.

¶ 24. Nationwide filed a motion in li-mine that stated:

Nationwide ... moves the court to exclude any reference or comment before the venire or jury related to the insurance policy issued by Nationwide ... made in the subject matter, and to exclude any…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harthcock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hodges v. Canal Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Lacy v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Government Employees Ins. Co. v. KrawzakSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  5. Medina v. PeraltaSupreme Court of Florida · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API