Legal Opinion

Pratt v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNER, A.C.J.

Kate T. Pratt, widow of Frank E. Pratt, brought this action to recover benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Law on account of the death of her husband alleged to have arisen as a result of an accident while he was employed by O. M. Middlekauff as a carpenter. Plaintiff’s claim was rejected by the defendant Oregon State Industrial Accident Commission for want of sufficient evidence. Thereafter she appealed to the circuit court where the matter was heard without a jury. From a judgment dismissing her complaint, plaintiff now appeals to this court.

The sole question for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shepard Et Ux. v. PurvineOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Newman v. StoverOregon Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. King v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hall v. PierceOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. King v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API